Author Topic: Way low KC-135  (Read 19580 times)

Offline TheSoccerMom

  • Chicken Farmer
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2590
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #45 on: January 01, 2007, 10:21:17 PM »
Yeah, there is plenty of low-level stuff out there, especially military games.   :o

In our fire job we have a waiver allowing us to operate below 500'AGL.  It's not uncommon to have to descend into a canyon bottom and fly the terrain real tight in order to be able to make the proper drop height over the jump spot to deliver cargo.  Otherwise you're trying hard to get down, yet not gain airspeed, and sometimes that's a pretty dumb combination.  The steepest country I ever dropped in required a 2000-foot change in elevation from the downwind (due to terrain) to the drop site.   :D   
Don't make me come back there!!!!

Offline Frank N. O.

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
  • Spin It!
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #46 on: January 01, 2007, 10:23:36 PM »
Hey Phil, when you mentioned perspective then I took a look at the sharp screengrab I was lucky to get and I looked at the shadows, the sun appears to be almost directly behind the plane and the shadow of the plane is fairly clear to see and then guessing that the vehicles were Hummers then that plane was not far sideways from the vechiles at all, or the ground. But the million dollar question is: How fast was it going?

Frank
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."
— Leonardo da Vinci

fireflyr

  • Guest
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #47 on: January 02, 2007, 12:14:17 AM »
Okie dokie then :) And in the spirit of low flying, here's a blast from the past (I couldn't find a useable download link and I doubt this forum can handle a near 2mb attachment but I found it online albiet in a slightly worse quality than the one on my hdd) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3652423044692761405&sourceid=searchfeed


NOW THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT |:)\ |:)\
See guys, would that pass be exciting if he was flying at a low cruise power setting?   You no---I say HELL NO!!!--it's only fun if you're WFO, and if the air is smooth you might even run across at Vne or a hair less!   Out of a shallow dive works best in little airplane.  -----DO NOT do this unless you're in a safe airport environment and you are aware of all other traffic.   Bear in mind that the majority of single engine fatalities come from low level maneuvering flight so use good sense and be comfortable with what you're doing or don't do it.   

Offline Baradium

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1606
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #48 on: January 02, 2007, 12:19:14 AM »
I think low passes are still fun at lower speeds too.  ;)

"Well I know what's right, I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin' me around
But I stand my ground, and I won't back down"
  -Johnny Cash "I won't back Down"

fireflyr

  • Guest
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #49 on: January 02, 2007, 12:23:58 AM »
I think low passes are still fun at lower speeds too.  ;)


That's what I call slow flight above the runway ::sleep::--something I have my taildragger students do to learn good crosswind techniques 8)

Offline chuckar101

  • Rooster
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
Re: Way low KC-135
« Reply #50 on: January 05, 2007, 06:33:10 PM »
The spit was awesome.  My opinion on the 135 is that we all just say that it is going at some speed low level and it's a great vid.  Also we should all drink some of that SoCo that FireFlyr keeps talking about, and bs about low level work. 
WOW I did that!