« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 »

Author Topic: ...3 bravo tango heavy...  (Read 14433 times)

Offline Zaffex

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
  • "It's ZULU TIME!!!"
...3 bravo tango heavy...
« on: July 04, 2006, 02:52:00 PM »
He He He! A very funny strip. So is there a particular reason why Hans has been flying with Chuck lately? Taking flying lessons or something? Just curious. Happy Independece Day, by the way. |:)\
Logged
"You know you're a redneck pilot when you think avgas makes a good cologne."

fireflyr

  • Guest
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2006, 03:58:57 PM »
HA!---Love the fat jokes >:(---what, ME sensitive   ;D ;D
Logged

Offline Frank N. O.

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2446
  • Spin It!
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2006, 04:02:19 PM »
ROFL, that was such a good one, even the ATC was in on it, and the look on Hans' face...  ;D 8) |:)\

Frank
Logged
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."
— Leonardo da Vinci

Offline Plthijnx

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
  • My da*n easy button's broken. Can I borrow yours?
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2006, 06:55:40 PM »
Quote from: fireflyr on July 04, 2006, 03:58:57 PM
....what, ME sensitive....

Nooooooo, never! not you! ;D
Logged
The three best things in life are a good landing, a good orgasm, and a good bowel movement. The night carrier landing is one of the few opportunities in life to experience all three at the same time. - Unknown

Offline Firegirl

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2006, 11:07:54 PM »
fat jokes are great!  ;D

Hey, ...uhm...
at which weight would a plane be considered "a heavy"?
Does it even go by weight?
Or are all airliners automatically Heavies?
Logged
If you ever reach total enlightenment while drinking beer, I bet you could shoot beer out of you nose.  --- Jack Handy

Offline Stef

  • Supreme Overlord
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 807
    • Chicken Wings
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2006, 02:57:45 PM »
Quote from: Firegirl on July 11, 2006, 11:07:54 PM
fat jokes are great!  ;D

Hey, ...uhm...
at which weight would a plane be considered "a heavy"?
Does it even go by weight?
Or are all airliners automatically Heavies?

I think they use the Body Mass Index!  ;D
Logged

Offline happylanding

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2006, 03:04:30 PM »
Quote from: Stef on July 12, 2006, 02:57:45 PM
Quote from: Firegirl on July 11, 2006, 11:07:54 PM
fat jokes are great!  ;D

Hey, ...uhm...
at which weight would a plane be considered "a heavy"?
Does it even go by weight?
Or are all airliners automatically Heavies?

I think they use the Body Mass Index!  ;D

HAHAHA! That could be a Sally's reply!! :)
So, what's the right one?!? ???
Logged
I give that landing a 9 . . . on the Richter scale.

Offline Mike

  • Supreme Overlord
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3384
Re: Sleek? Gulf? Ted?
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2006, 10:54:29 PM »
HA HA!!
Body mass index!

Looks like we just came up with a new strip!!  ;)

I'll try to find out the right answer.
Anybody else know??
Fireflyr?? Sleek? Ted?? Gulf?
Logged
Dear IRS: Please cancel my subscription.

Offline happylanding

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2006, 10:57:17 PM »
I was searching for the answer, and I run into this article.........uhoh!!


http://www.canada.com/topics/travel/story.html?id=c054b5a4-268a-4b8e-940c-c474708b9a5a
Logged
I give that landing a 9 . . . on the Richter scale.

fireflyr

  • Guest
Re: Sleek? Gulf? Ted?
« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2006, 01:34:25 AM »
Quote from: Mike on July 12, 2006, 10:54:29 PM
HA HA!!
Body mass index!

Looks like we just came up with a new strip!!  ;)

I'll try to find out the right answer.
Anybody else know??
Fireflyr?? Sleek? Ted?? Gulf?

I thought they (ATC) used the "HEAVY" designation on any wide body such as DC-10, 747, 777, ETC. ???
Interesting question though---I'm still looking.
Logged

Offline happylanding

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2006, 08:38:24 AM »
I was just wondering....isn't the light/medium/heavy classification related to the wake turbolence they develop?!? (so, in that case it's also related to weight). and maybe there is a kind of list of aircraft that says which aicraft must go into a category or another....

Morning toughts....   :) :) :)
Logged
I give that landing a 9 . . . on the Richter scale.

Offline Firegirl

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #11 on: July 13, 2006, 04:48:36 PM »
Thanks for the effort guys!

Brings up another question though.... When is a plane called a "wide body" then?
Does it go by how many seats are in a row?
(I know my questions might be stupid...sorry)



Hans is kind of a "wide-body", huh?!  ::)   ;D ;D
Logged
If you ever reach total enlightenment while drinking beer, I bet you could shoot beer out of you nose.  --- Jack Handy

Offline happylanding

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2006, 05:18:06 PM »
Quote from: Firegirl on July 13, 2006, 04:48:36 PM
Hans is kind of a "wide-body", huh?!  ::)   ;D ;D

Oh, I can't help you with this question. I had never heard the expression wide body before.  ??? ??? ???
HAHAHAHA! Poor Hans! He won't have any respect since he doesn't lose some weight! The strange is, that yogurt is not so bad: you could find it in almost every regime!!! YOu sure he did not run a beer factory instead?!?
Logged
I give that landing a 9 . . . on the Richter scale.

fireflyr

  • Guest
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2006, 03:49:30 AM »
Quote from: happylanding on July 13, 2006, 08:38:24 AM
I was just wondering....isn't the light/medium/heavy classification related to the wake turbolence they develop?!? (so, in that case it's also related to weight). and maybe there is a kind of list of aircraft that says which aicraft must go into a category or another....

Morning toughts....   :) :) :)
Wake turbulence is probably a factor---I agree |:)\
Logged

Offline Gulfstream Driver

  • Chicken Farmer
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1070
Re: ...3 bravo tango heavy...
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2006, 04:32:06 AM »
I always thought it was wide-bodies that were heavy.  The wake turbulence theory is a sound one, though.  Is it in the AIM?
Logged
Behind every great man, there is a woman rolling her eyes.  --Bruce Almighty
Pages: 1 2 3 »
« previous next »