It seems that the story was at least partly exagerated again by the media. At the danish forum a person claiming to be the pilot, in the news identified as the president, said that it was a private parkinglot, he landed in the middle of it and taxied to the edge not to take all of it looking like a powermonger, and the space was a lot better in real life than described and it was only twice and there was permission. They'd had a complaint earlier from a neighbour that didn't like their vehicles parked on the side of the road due to their numbers although it was legal so he thinks it might be him. The post seemed very calm, mature and responsible, like you people here. What the posters of the forum said before he posted was something like like: "Darn that's cool I'd do that too!" "It's probably just a dumb jalous person that complained!" In DK we had a principle called the Jante-law, meaning that you shouldn't think you were any better than any other and don't show off. The posters mentioned that too. Luckily at least the real pilot seems to be a more responsible person than shown by the papers and I just hope the others at the forum aren't fulltime pilots.
Kind of a good end to a bad story I think and yet more proof that the media and other people talk a lot about subjects they don't know enough about to do what they do, like a certain danish newspaper-editor and some drawings of religous nature, he should've researched if it was a mortal sin or not to make them, and he should've heeded the warnings he indeed got before signing them off for printing.
But it seems like a loosing battle for the most part so I can only try to keep up my own way of behaving in real life evn if I slip up like this time, and try to investiage things myself and from more than one source and also talk to real people and not exclusively read from a single news-source about subjects, especially important ones. I just hope information and news from AOPA and the FAA is more dependable.
Thanks for the reassuring posts

Frank