Author Topic: Aircraft identification  (Read 4680 times)

Offline Baradium

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1606
Aircraft identification
« on: January 13, 2009, 10:58:01 PM »
Friend of mine asked me to try to identify some airplane pictures for him, aircraft he had problem figuring out etc.

Some of these I know what they are, some I don't. 

Some pictures are pretty tough, one or two are the kinds of pictures that they would have put up for the competitive aircraft ID events back when I did that sort of thing with the university's flight team.






^This one is a toughy
























"Well I know what's right, I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin' me around
But I stand my ground, and I won't back down"
  -Johnny Cash "I won't back Down"

Offline Oddball

  • Chicken Farmer
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2420
  • I crash better than anybody I know
    • Myspace profile
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2009, 12:38:04 AM »
the one called "toughy" is a Eagle or was that sarcasm? the last one was of the Euro Fighter Typhoon and i think that one is hanging up in the R.A.F Museum at Hendon
"You can teach monkeys to fly better than that!"and "spring chicken to sh**e hawk in one easy lesson"

Offline ZK Kiwi

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • Wings Over NZ Aviation Forum
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2009, 02:07:46 AM »
Best as i can make out:
F16
F15 (Nasa canard experiment)
Mig 29
F14 Tomcat and MiG 29
Sukhoi Su27
Mig 29
F14
MiG29
MiG29
Su27
f16
F16
F18
Typhoon

thats as far as i can tell. The real toughie is distinguishing Mig29s from Sukhois. the su27 is much bigger than the Mig29, and has a proportinately longer nose. engines seem closer together, and the fins dont have extension strakes on the front. The mig is stubber, has a smaller wing, aux inlets in the leading edge strakes. The fins have forward extensions and the nose landing gear is forward of the intakes. Unfortunately I cant make out enough detail on some of those angles!

If it was supposed to be easy, everyone would be doing it!

Offline Baradium

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1606
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2009, 05:07:12 AM »
the one called "toughy" is a Eagle or was that sarcasm? the last one was of the Euro Fighter Typhoon and i think that one is hanging up in the R.A.F Museum at Hendon

the one called "toughy" isn't an Eagle...  ;)

It might have started out life as one, but Eagles don't have canards (or number of other changes I can see from a glance)

I need the actual designators for these.  That particular bird might well be an X plane, so I need the designator for it if so (that number of changes it wouldn't surprise me if it has an X designator).


 ZK Kiwi, I think you got the order off a bit, so your answers don't neccessarily match to all the pictures.  ;)  Any ones you aren't sure about, please let me know,   I don't want to give him answers for anything that might not be correct.


Thanks

"Well I know what's right, I got just one life
In a world that keeps on pushin' me around
But I stand my ground, and I won't back down"
  -Johnny Cash "I won't back Down"

Offline madpilot44

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2009, 06:26:59 AM »
the pics are:

F-16 Falcon (two of them actually, note the other tail above the engine exhaust)
F-15 Eagle S/MTD (STOL/Maneuver technology demonstrator) http://www.aviationtrivia.info/F-15S-MTD.php
Mig 29 Fulcrum and F-14 Tomcat
Mig 29 OVT/Mig 35 (same thing, designation change depends on where you're reading. basically a Mig 29 with new avionics and thrust vectoring) http://www.richard-seaman.com/Aircraft/AirShows/Maks2005/Highlights/index.html
Su 27 Flanker (from the Russian Knights demonstration team)
F-14D Tomcat (this one actually a bombcat, note the tip of the bomb hanging off of it)
Mig 29 crash in Farnborough, 1989 http://www.aviapedia.com/video/two-mig-29-crash-video
Mig 29 (looks like the Slovakian new camo) http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/Digital-Thunder-Camo-for-Slovakias-MiG-29s-04814/
Su 27UB (UB means two seater in russian, something like that. This one has the Sukhoi demo paint)
F-16 Falcon
F-16 Falcon firing an AIM-9 sidewinder
F-18 Hornet, probably a C version
Eurofighter Typhoon http://www.skycontrol.net/history/the-raf-museum-is-proud-to-announce-its-newest-exhibit-the-prototype-eurofighter-typhoon-da-2zh588-the-first-of-its-kind-to-be-on-display-in-the-uk/

had some extra time for the research lol...
To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home.

Offline ZK Kiwi

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • Wings Over NZ Aviation Forum
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2009, 06:51:54 AM »
O.K,
#1 F16 (Probably a C model)
#2 F15 S/MTD (STOL/ Manouver Technology Demonstrator - checked on Google to get correct designation)
#3 MiG29 (front) with F14 Escort
#4 Mig 29 (not 100% sure on this one, although it doesnt have wingtip rockets which is another Mig ID feature)
#5 Sukhoi Su-35 (the updated -27)
#6 F14
#7 MiG 29
#8 MiG 29
#9 Su-27UB
#10 F16
#11 F18 C (I thought this was an F16 initially, but there isnt a frame at the rear of the canopy)
#12 F18 - probably a C model going by the general size (the Es are a big larger)
#14 Eurofighter Typhoon
If it was supposed to be easy, everyone would be doing it!

Offline G-man

  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2047
  • Cogito sumere potum alterum.
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2009, 04:33:57 PM »
All I know---NO helicopters.
Life may not be the party we hoped for---but while we're here--we might as well dance..........

Offline Oddball

  • Chicken Farmer
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2420
  • I crash better than anybody I know
    • Myspace profile
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2009, 05:43:47 PM »
All I know---NO helicopters.

is that such a bad thing?  ::thinking:: ::whistle::
"You can teach monkeys to fly better than that!"and "spring chicken to sh**e hawk in one easy lesson"

Offline madpilot44

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2009, 08:27:52 PM »
#4 Mig 29 (not 100% sure on this one, although it doesnt have wingtip rockets which is another Mig ID feature)

Mig-35, different size and shape of the exhaust...

#5 Sukhoi Su-35 (the updated -27)

still a SU 27, unless I'm missing the cannards of the 35

#11 F18 C (I thought this was an F16 initially, but there isnt a frame at the rear of the canopy)

it's an F-16 if I'm right. no double tails, the pilot has his hand on the F-16 stick, the aileron has the 3 thingies (technical term) sticking out the aileron that the F-18 doesn't have, and the patch looks like an Air Force one (pacific air forces?)

whoa... what a plane geek...
To most people, the sky is the limit. To those who love aviation, the sky is home.

Offline ZK Kiwi

  • Cockerel
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • Wings Over NZ Aviation Forum
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2009, 09:37:06 PM »
You're quite likely right Madpilot, we dont see any of these birds down here in NZ! :)
If it was supposed to be easy, everyone would be doing it!

Offline Fabo

  • Chicken Farmer
  • Alpha Rooster
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
  • If flying is a drug,then I am a first class addict
Re: Aircraft identification
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2009, 11:54:42 PM »
Confirming madpilot on all MiG/Su points. No.4 is from Strizhi demo team btw. and the other one is really new digi camo of SQF (I should now, see avatar :) )
"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return."