Another nail in the coffin of the Boeing Airbus debate.... Compare the pictures of the BA 777 hitting the ground at landing speed to the ones of the A340 that hit a wall at 30 kts... I admit that the two accidents were totally different situations..... But I still follow the adage If it aint' Boeing I aint' going
Substitute Canadair and MD/Douglas for Boeing into that as well... while I hear the quirks that the Brazillian made birds have when our techs at work have to go do a gate call can make you wonder. the E-190's that Jet Blue flies out of Burlington to Orlando take over 10 minutes to "Boot" up once power is on the airplane, if you bump any of the the controls before the plane boots up you have to shut it down and do it all again 
We had a CRJ in the shop over the weekend, had a gear disagree (nose wheel wouldn't come up) but it still locked down. changed out a valve, put it on jacks, swung the gear 4-5 times and she was good to go. I gotta post the pics of the CRJ out on the ramp on jacks with the wheels up.... Kinda erie
Brian
What about the CRJ that had the landing gear that indicated down when it wasn't?

As far as this... a friend of mine who flies 767s conjectured that maybe flying into a large flock of birds could have done it... but he said it'd have taken a LOT of birds to stall a turbofan with a 13' diameter.
He said he saw a short video clip of the plane right before/at the crash. He said it was at an extremely high AOA, behind the power curve. It would look like that in a windshear situation, but other factors could lead to that as well.
The GE engines on the 777 spin up faster than the pratts, but engines that large still take a long time to spool up. If they brought the power to idle too early and waited too long to correct it, that might have had an effect (this is from me, not him... he just commented about the spool up times).